HERBALIFE IS INDEED AN MLM BUT NOT A PONZI

This is an excellent little piece of investigation by John Hempton at Bronte Capital. As you will know Bill Ackman has a massive short position on against Herbalife. His basic contention is that the company is similar to a Ponzi scheme and therefore cannot continue indefinitely. As such it will inevitably collapse and thus the massive short on it doing so. All of which seems fair enough as an expression of a view. But the interesting part of the discussion then becomes whether it is indeed a Ponzi and is thus inevitably going to collapse. And a part of that story is that if it is indeed a Ponzi then it should be forcibly closed down, thus making Ackman’s short almost self-proving.

But is it? No one doubts at all that Herbalife is a multi-level marketing scheme (MLM). But there’s nothing illegal about that: the potential illegality is if it crosses the line into a Ponzi. As Hempton points out, this is reasonably well defined in law as well:

This legal definition is the core to the whole Herbalife story – so I will write it out:

If an organization sells goods or services to the public and the participants in the organization obtain monetary benefits from (1) recruiting new members and (2) selling the organization’s goods and services to consumers, the organization is deemed a pyramid scheme if the participants obtain their monetary benefits primarily from recruitment rather than the sale of goods and services to consumers. [Emphasis as per Bill Ackman…]

In summary: real sales to consumers is kosher. Sales to distributors (and not to end consumers) are not kosher. A little of the latter is OK (the distributors do need to have some stock). A lot of the latter is not.

The critical question is how much are sales to consumers.

The beauty of what Hempton does next is that he uses the scientific method to try and work out which of those two descriptions is true. That scientific method being that you use your thesis to make predictions. You then try to show that those predictions are wrong: meaning that your thesis must be wrong as well. It simply doesn’t accord with that real world out there. In this case Hempton’s assumed working thesis is that Herbalife is indeed a Ponzi scheme. Which means that most (or perhaps “too much of”) the revenue comes from selling stock to distributors who have just been recruited. Distributors who don’t then manage to sell the stuff on.

Well, what would be the effect of this? Clearly, it would be that there’s therefore some large number of failed Herbalife distributors with large amounts of paid for stock on their hands. And if that were true then we would see people trying to sell the stuff for whatever they could get. Hey, it didn’t work out so let’s get at least some pennies on our dollars back. We also know where such sales are likely to happen: on e-Bay of course. So, let’s go look at e-Bay and see if there’s lots of dead Herbalife materials being offered for cheap. As Hempton reports:

I looked and looked. Honestly I did. And I could find no evidence of large sales at distress – the sort of sales that would happen if there were 50 thousand tonnes per year build up of unsold inventory in the hands of “failed distributors”.

And so we have it. Bill Ackman had a thesis. I calculated the implications of that thesis (distress selling on Ebay and Craigs List). This observation did not accord with reality.

Therefore Bill Ackman is wrong. And it does not matter how beautiful Bill Ackman is, how smart he is, how rich he is, or whatever. He is still wrong. And there isn’t any room for argument about it.

If the real world doesn’t agree with the predictions made by your thesis then it’s the theory or thesis that is wrong, not the real world. Herbalife is indeed an MLM but it’s not a Ponzi. All of which seems like rather bad luck for Mr. Ackman.

Comments

  1. harjinder singh says

    sir ji plan aisa tyar karen ki sab se nichla distibuter jab kam kare us ko jiyda rupees aana chaheiye jaisa ki niche diye plan me dikh raha hi ehi plan ko thoda dyan se padhie agar sach me rcm ke dwara ARTHIK AZADI ABHIYAN chalane ke bare soch rahe to pls read it

    khud ko bv ka 10% aur jintne logo ki parposal dalta hai un ki sale ka 10% is se aage10000 to 19999———————– 1%
    20000 to 39999 —————————-2%
    40000 to 69999—————————- 3%
    70000 to 114999—————————- 4%
    115000 to 169999————————— 6%
    170000 to 259999 —————————8%
    260000 to 349999————————— 10%
    3500000 ton upar————————— 12%
    maan lijea tumare a leg me 110000bv
    b lef me 60000bv
    aur tumari sale 2000bv
    totle business 172000bv ka hua
    172000 ka 8% slab se———– 13760rs com bna
    a leg 11000 ka——- 4%ki slab se——— 4400rs
    bleg 60000 ka——– 3% ki slab se ——1800rs hua a aur
    b ka com——— 4400+1800=6200
    aur tumara net com 13760-6200=7560
    +tumare 20 parposal ka 10% se=2000
    +tumari2000 ki sale ka 10% se =200
    TOTAL = 9760 is se aage 8%roylti 5% tec bouns a leg me 3500000bv aur b lg me 115000bv ka business hota hai to roylty ka cheak bhi 17400 rs banta hai ek roylty achevar k bhi kam se kam 30 parposel to honge us ki sale ka 10% se 3000rs aur roylty achevar ki apni 2000bv ki sale ka 640rs total 17400+3000+640=21040rs bana is plan pe jarur vichar karen agar is plan se sehmat ho to is plan ko lagoo karane ki kosis karen kion ki yeh plan nichle distibuter ke liye fidymand rahega aur leader logo ke com me bhi koi khas farak nhi padega kiya sach me aisa plan nahi hona chaheiy agar nahi to kiyon. ki aap is ke bare me bta sakte hain plz jarur batain

    REPLY

  2. says

    Have you dreamed about quitting your regular job and working online? If so, you have come to the right place. There are plenty of people out there who no longer have to punch a time clock. Learn about the ways that you can start making money online. Eventually, you may even be able to quit your regular job.

Leave a Reply